During the appraisal, the committee found:
• The clinical trial demonstrated gains favouring azacitidine in its primary efficacy end point of overall survival, but failed to reach statistical significance when comparing azacitidine with the combined conventional care regimen.
• The committee concluded that the degree to which azacitidine was more effective than any of the individual conventional care regimens was very uncertain.
• The most plausible incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for azacitidine compared with a conventional care regimen is £240,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained.